Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 APRIL 2026

No Counsel, No Privilege: Courts Signal That Client AI Use May Fall Outside Attorney-Client Privilege

A recent decision in the Southern District of New York is continuing to garner attention in the legal community. In February, Judge Rakoff issued a landmark decision rejecting...

United StatesTechnology

A recent decision in the Southern District of New York is continuing to garner attention in the legal community. In February, Judge Rakoff issued a landmark decision rejecting attorney‑client privilege and work‑product doctrine protections for documents generated using artificial intelligence (AI).

In United States v. Heppner, the Court addressed whether a criminal defendant’s interactions with a publicly available generative AI platform, Claude, were privileged. The court held that both information entered into, and materials generated by, an AI tool were not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. See United States v. Heppner, 2026 WL 436579 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2026).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from