As with so many other facets of our everyday lives, from our purchasing habits to our healthcare, to even the entertainment we consume, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is being integrated into the practice of law at an increasingly rapid rate.
As with so many other facets of our everyday lives, from our
purchasing habits to our healthcare, to even the entertainment we
consume, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is being
integrated into the practice of law at an increasingly rapid rate.
One area where GenAI is already making a significant impact in the
legal industry is in discovery, where new tools are being
implemented to help attorneys quickly review, assess, and summarize
large quantities of electronic data belonging to clients and
opposing parties.
These tools can certainly be helpful, but the use of GenAI
programs in e-discovery is not without risk. Hallucinations –
where GenAI provides incorrect answers to prompts or completely
fabricated citations to authority – have already led to
several infamous occurrences where lawyers failed to validate the
program's output. In addition to concerns over the accuracy of
output from GenAI, lawyers must also be aware of our obligations to
maintain
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.