Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 NOVEMBER 2016

Cybersecurity Liability: Delaware Has Good News For Directors

The Delaware Chancery Court just issued an opinion that will have directors breathing a sigh of relief in connection with cybersecurity risks.

United StatesTechnology

The Delaware Chancery Court just issued an opinion that will have directors breathing a sigh of relief in connection with cybersecurity risks. In its opinion – Reiter v Fairbank, C.A. No. 11693-CB (Del. Ch. Oct. 18, 2016) – the Chancery Court articulated the standards of "bad faith" that must exist in order for directors to be held liable for failing to exercise oversight with regard to the corporation's compliance with law in a risky area.

Duty of oversight

The duty of oversight was first articulated in In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation, 698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996). This duty arises from a director's duty of loyalty to the corporation. This breach involves a conscious disregard by the director of his or her responsibilities; that the director "utterly failed" to implement a system of reporting of controls; or the director consciously failed to monitor operations and thereby was disabled from being informed of risks requiring the director's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from