Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2026

Reasonable Control: Verification And Documentation Of Machine Assisted Work In Architectural Practice

AI has entered the ordinary work of architectural practice. Large language models (LLMs) draft specification sections from a firm’s master, summarize code provisions, screen submittals, and prepare responses to requests for information.

United StatesStrategy

Part I | The Condition Observed

1.1 Existing Conditions

AI has entered the ordinary work of architectural practice. Large language models (LLMs) draft specification sections from a firm’s master, summarize code provisions, screen submittals, and prepare responses to requests for information. They also draft the design narratives and construction-phase correspondence that may later become important in a dispute. Practitioners have taken up these tools task by task, often under the same deadline pressure that governs the rest of their work. Professional institutions have had to respond while that adoption was already under way.

AIA has issued professional guidance and a firm toolkit. NCARB has published an architectural regulatory position and model provisions; ICOR has issued cross-profession regulatory principles; and the NSPE Board of Ethical Review has addressed AI in an advisory engineering ethics opinion. Despite their different legal effect and professional scope, they share a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from