Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2007

U.S. District Court Decision Points Out Potential Risks In Non-Recourse Loans

Bracewell LLP
Bracewell LLP
Contributor
Bracewell LLP

Bracewell LLP

Paris is a vital energy hub in Europe, and our Paris office plays a central role in helping address...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bracewell LLP

Earlier this year, in a decision handed down in favor of a commercial mortgage lender, the United States District Court for Massachusetts offered a clear warning to careless borrowers.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

Borrowers and Guarantors Urged to Negotiate Clear, Defensible "Bad-Boy Provisions" That Limit Liability

Earlier this year, in a decision handed down in favor of a commercial mortgage lender, the United States District Court for Massachusetts offered a clear warning to careless borrowers. The case, Blue Hills Office Park LLC v J.P. Morgan Chase Bank (477 F.Supp 2d 366 (D.Mass. 2007), demonstrates:

  • the importance of carefully negotiating the terms of non-recourse loans, and
  • the value of limiting borrower and guarantor liability — and lender recourse — to appropriate levels and specific situations.

This decision is particularly important, since there are relatively few cases that deal with the enforceability of "non-recourse carveouts" (also known as "bad-boy carveouts") and the lender’s ability to take advantage of overly broad terms to accelerate foreclosure and recover the full amount of a loan.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from