Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2026

Governmental Approval Of A Private Development Cannot Trigger A Takings Claim

Nossaman LLP
Nossaman LLP
Contributor
Nossaman LLP

Nossaman LLP

Our clients and our people are what define Nossaman. Our clients provide us with opportunities to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Nossaman LLP

When the government approves a private development that diminishes neighboring property values, can a property owner maintain a takings claim?

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

When the government approves a private development that diminishes neighboring property values, can a property owner maintain a takings claim? According to a recent California court decision, the answer is no – governmental approval of a private project cannot trigger inverse condemnation liability.

Background

In De La Cruz v. City of Los Angeles (2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26413), a new six-story apartment building was being constructed next to the plaintiff's residence. The development was approved without a full environmental impact report based on a CEQA exemption for projects near transit. The property owner sued the City for inverse condemnation under the federal and state takings clause, arguing the project would block all direct sunlight during afternoon hours and the owner's property would no longer be fit as a family home. The City sought to dismiss the lawsuit, asserting that the approval of a development project does not constitute a taking as a matter of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from