Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 APRIL 2023

Construction & Claims: April 2023

Nossaman LLP
Nossaman LLP
Contributor
Nossaman LLP

Nossaman LLP

Our clients and our people are what define Nossaman. Our clients provide us with opportunities to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Nossaman LLP

Welcome to Construction & Claims, a periodic digest of the headlines, statutory and regulatory changes and court cases involving construction news, claims, bid protests, contract administration...

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

Welcome to Construction & Claims, a periodic digest of the headlines, statutory and regulatory changes and court cases involving construction news, claims, bid protests, contract administration and payment-related disputes.

If there is a particular subject or jurisdiction you'd like to see covered, please let us know.

Cell-Crete Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company

In this case, the Court of Appeal examined whether a payment bond surety, who prevails in a claim against the payment bond, is entitled to statutory attorneys' fees when the party actually incurring the attorneys' fees was the general contractor, pursuant to its defense and indemnity obligations, as opposed to the surety itself. The Court explained that a judge must award reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party regardless of whether the prevailing party ultimately is responsible for paying the fees. This case clarifies that prevailing payment bond sureties, even if defended by the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from