Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2024

"Catastrophic" Construction?: The Government's Continued Payment Defeats Materiality

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

This January, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania rejected a subcontractor's doomsday allegations that a general contractor had submitted false claims for defective construction work ...

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

This January, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania rejected a subcontractor's doomsday allegations that a general contractor had submitted false claims for defective construction work on a project to build a new school on the Marine Corps Base in Quantico, Virginia. In Chowns Group LLC v. John C. Grimberg Co., the court held that notwithstanding the subcontractor's assertions that the defects were so severe as to create a "catastrophic safety hazard," the alleged non-compliance was not material to the government's decision to pay. The subcontractor, a company called Chowns, also brought a novel retaliation claim under Section 13730(h)(1) of the False Claims Act (FCA), claiming that the general contractor, Grimberg, terminated Chowns in retaliation for Chowns' complaint about the construction defects to the government. Both claims failed and were dismissed at the pleadings stage.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from