Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 OCTOBER 2021

Seventh Circuit Moves Vicarious Liability Claims Forward

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contributor
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt is a multidisciplinary, integrated national professional services firm known for quality and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Reversing dismissal, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit found that a plaintiff had sufficiently pled allegations of vicarious liability to keep his Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) suit alive.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Reversing dismissal, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit found that a plaintiff had sufficiently pled allegations of vicarious liability to keep his Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) suit alive.

Christopher Bilek received two unauthorized robocalls. A prerecorded message allegedly solicited health insurance and instructed Bilek to press 1 to be connected to a representative. When he pressed 1, Bilek was allegedly connected to a live agent who provided a quote for health insurance underwritten by Federal Insurance Company (FIC) and facilitated by Health Insurance Innovations (HII).

Bilek sued FIC and HII for running afoul of the TCPA and Illinois's state analog on a vicarious liability theory, claiming that the defendants' agents generated the calls.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from