Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2026

NAD Reminds AI Advertisers: Correlation Is Not Causation

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

A recent NAD decision involving an AI-enabled fall detection platform raises critical questions about proving causation versus correlation in artificial intelligence advertising. The case examines whether evidence showing positive outcomes associated with AI technology is sufficient to claim the technology itself causes those results...

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

A recent NAD decision involving SafelyYou, an AI-enabled fall detection and monitoring platform for assisted living and memory care facilities, highlights an important theme in AI advertising: proving that a technology is associated with positive outcomes is not the same as proving that the technology itself causes those outcomes. 

NAD reviewed a variety of claims about the platform, including claims about fall detection accuracy, response times, false alarms, reductions in falls and emergency room visits, and cost savings. NAD found that many of the claims—including claims that staff are alerted in seconds, that the system generates very few false alarms, and that communities using the product experienced significant reductions in falls—were supported.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from