Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MAY 2025

NAD Holds Puffery Analysis Depends On Material Connection Disclosure

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Church & Dwight ran ads for TheraBreath Mouthwash that featured a dentist in a white lab coat identifying him as Dr. Harold Katz. In some of the ads, Dr. Katz holds the product and states: ​"It's a better mouthwash. I guarantee it."

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Church & Dwight ran ads for TheraBreath Mouthwash that featured a dentist in a white lab coat identifying him as Dr. Harold Katz. In some of the ads, Dr. Katz holds the product and states:"It's a better mouthwash. I guarantee it."

P&G challenged the ads, making two key arguments. First, P&G pointed out that the ads should clearly disclose that Dr. Katz is the founder of TheraBreath, rather than suggest he's an independent dentist. Second, P&G argued that Dr. Katz's statement conveyed an unsubstantiated claim that TheraBreath is better than other mouthwashes. Church & Dwight countered by arguing that the statement was puffery.

In an interesting decision, NAD held that the answer to the question of whether Dr. Katz's statement conveyed an objective claim – which would require substantiation – or whether it was puffery – which would not require substantiation – depended, in part, on whether Church & Dwight clearly disclosed Dr. Katz's connection to TheraBreath.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from