Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JUNE 2018

Lanham Act v. FDA: Butt Who Cares?

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Contributor
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Founded more than 40 years ago as a boutique law firm servicing the entertainment and arts...

View firm profile
Explore more from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Bear with me. Yes, this blog post is about a false advertising case involving hemorrhoid treatments, but the legal issues are really interesting and important.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Bear with me.  Yes, this blog post is about a false advertising case involving hemorrhoid treatments, but the legal issues are really interesting and important.  Trust me.

This case concerns two companies that make hemorroid treatments.  One treatment, Anucort, is alleged to be a leading prescription product, sold by G&W Labs as a hydrocortisone acetate 25 mg suppository.  The other, Hemmorex, sold by Laser Pharmaceuticals, is advertised and labeled as also providing 25 mg of hydrocortisone acetate in suppository form.  However, according to G&W, Hemmorex does not, in fact, provide that amount of the active ingredient; indeed, G&W claims that its lab testing shows that Hemmorex releases less than 20%—that is, less than 5 mg—of the 25 mg labeled amount of active ingredient.  Accordingly, G&W alleges, Laser's claim that Hemmorex is an equivalent to, and substitute for, Anucort, is false and misleading.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from