Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 SEPTEMBER 2018

False Advertising Of Entertainment Is Different

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Contributor
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Founded more than 40 years ago as a boutique law firm servicing the entertainment and arts...

View firm profile
Explore more from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

False advertising claims based on the advertising and promotion of films, television, and even music are being made at an alarming rate.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

False advertising claims based on the advertising and promotion of films, television, and even music are being made at an alarming rate.  Subjects of films seeking to suppress portrayals that they do not like have added to their right of publicity claims an assertion that the promotion of the films falsely claim that it is a true story. Given the expansive definition of "advertising" under California false advertising law laid down by the California Supreme Court in Nike v. Kasky, advertising and promotion of entertainment appeared vulnerable to claims under California false advertising law.

In rejecting such claims by Olivia de Havilland over her portrayal in Lifetime's "Feud," the California Court ruled that the First Amendment protected expressive works from such claims, but did not analyze the elements of the state law claim.  Now the California Court of Appeals has provided an application of California false advertising law to entertainment, and it found that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from