Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2001

Domain Name Confusion From Ruling On eReferee

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
John Patton
John Patton

The emerging law of domain names has been thrown a curve by a federal judge in Wisconsin who has ruled that the owner of eReferee.com cannot use the word "referee" in connection with its site. The ruling is a surprise in at least two respects. First, it reverses the prior decision of an arbitrator from the dispute resolution arm of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). To date, almost all ICANN arbitrators’ rulings have been affirmed by courts in the rare instances in which litigation has ensued.

Second, the judge’s ruling appears to grant Referee Magazine, the plaintiff, exclusive right to use the word "referee" in connection with online activities. Heretofore, arbitrators and courts typically have held that commonly used words are not exclusive even to parties who have trademarks on those words in connection with other activities. Although the magazine owner has a trademark protecting the word "referee" in connection with its paper publication, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from