Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2018

DC Circuit's ACA v. FCC Decision: Implications For Calling And Texting Retail Did You Know?

In a much-anticipated decision, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has ruled on the Federal Communication Commission's 2015 Declaratory Order on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, focusing on autodialing equipment, reassigned phone numbers, and revocation of consent.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Kristin Hadgis
Kristin Hadgis
Kenneth Kliebard
Kenneth Kliebard
Ronald Del Sesto Jr
Ronald Del Sesto Jr
Robert Brochin
Robert Brochin
Brian Ercole
Brian Ercole
Molly Lane
Molly Lane

In a much-anticipated decision, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has ruled on the Federal Communication Commission's 2015 Declaratory Order on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, focusing on autodialing equipment, reassigned phone numbers, and revocation of consent. This edition of Morgan Lewis Retail Did You Know? highlights that this decision, and changes to the Federal Communications Commission under the Trump administration, may have the effect of narrowing liability for retailers that call or text customers, although the decision still leaves companies with uncertainty.

Background

The DC Circuit recently handed down its long-awaited decision in ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission. This decision will be of great interest to retailers who call or text customers, employees, or other individuals. The court reviewed challenges to several aspects of the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC's) 2015 Declaratory Order, namely (1)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from