Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 FEBRUARY 2019

California Northern District To AMD: Work That Core!

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

In the end, as it so often does, the case comes down to semantics.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Court gives green light to class action over computer processor structure

Core v. Module

In the end, as it so often does, the case comes down to semantics.

A consumer class action launched in 2015 alleges that Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) misrepresented the number of core processors in its line of "Bulldozer" CPUs.

First, a quick and dirty definition: A core processor is an independent processing unit within a computer's CPU. Each core processor can independently execute user commands; the expectation is that several independent processors splitting commands between them will execute all of them faster than a single processor would.

The case, filed in California's Northern District, alleges that AMD plays fast and loose with its definition of "core." AMD, the original suit claims, "built the Bulldozer processors by stripping away components from two cores and combining what was left to make a single 'module.' But by removing certain components of two cores

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from