Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2024

Anti 'Junk Fee' Lawsuit Risk Already Growing

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

Everyone hates "junk fees." Just the name suggests that the junk fee refers to surprise, unnecessary charges, tacked onto advertised prices in a manner that is deceptive or unfair.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Everyone hates "junk fees." Just the name suggests that the junk fee refers to surprise, unnecessary charges, tacked onto advertised prices in a manner that is deceptive or unfair. The Biden Administration has announced a popular administrative effort to ban them. The FTC is one of the first agencies out of the gate, currently considering a proposed rule to ban junk fees.

A sign that regulatory action often inspires private litigation, plaintiffs' lawyers are already lining up junk fee lawsuits. Various cultural attractions in New York City have been sued for supposedly tacking on sizable "junk" fees to tickets. For example, in a recent case, plaintiffs allege that the New York City Museum of Ice Cream tacks on a $9.50 "service fee" to every ticket sale. Regular prices advertised for tickets appear to run from $30 to $50, so the service fees constitute a sizable percentage of the total sale. The fees are "flashed," according to the complaint, only after the consumer

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from