Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 DECEMBER 2012

"Angry Birds" Motion For Preliminary Injunction

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Contributor
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Founded more than 40 years ago as a boutique law firm servicing the entertainment and arts...

View firm profile
Explore more from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

We blogged that the Northern District of California denied a motion by Rovio Entertainment Ltd. for an ex parte temporary restraining order against alleged counterfeiters of Angry Birds plush toys.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

On November 21, we blogged that the Northern District of California denied a motion by Rovio Entertainment Ltd. ("Rovio"), the developer of the video game Angry Birds, for an ex parte temporary restraining order ("TRO") against alleged counterfeiters of Angry Birds plush toys. Rovio moved for the TRO in connection with its copyright and trademark infringement action against Royal Plush Toys, Inc., Western Sales and Services Inc., Royal Trade Int'l Inc. and John K. Park (collectively, "Defendants"), stemming from Defendants' allegedly intentional and willful sale of infringing plush toys in violation of Rovio's copyright and trademark rights. Despite denying Rovio's motion for a TRO, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong ordered an expedited hearing schedule on Rovio's motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin Defendants from manufacturing, distributing, supplying or selling the allegedly infringing merchandise.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from