Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2014

ADT Home Security Settles Charges Over Deceptive Advertising

ArentFox Schiff
ArentFox Schiff
Contributor
Explore more from ArentFox Schiff

The FTC is cracking down on misleading endorsements in advertising, and the home security company ADT has the lumps to prove it.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

What Made News?

The FTC is cracking down on misleading endorsements in advertising, and the home security company ADT has the lumps to prove it. Earlier this month, ADT settled FTC charges that it had deceived consumers by failing to disclose that "independent" security experts were in fact paid ADT spokespeople.

Background on the FTC Endorsement Guides

The FTC recently issued revised guidelines that govern the use of endorsements in advertising (the Guides). The Guides set out the general principles that the FTC uses to evaluate whether endorsements will be considered deceptive and therefore illegal under Section 5 of the FTC Act. Specifically, the Guides note that endorsements must reflect the honest opinions and experience of the endorser and that advertisers must disclose any "material connections" between the endorser and the seller of the advertised product. When such a connection exists, for example if the endorser is being paid by the advertising

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from