Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2017

‘Pro' Plaintiff's Umpteenth TCPA Case Will Go On

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

There are any number of good reasons Jan Konopca kept his landline number and switched over to cell phone service.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Cooked claims? Maybe, says court, but harm is real

Squirrel Attack!

There are any number of good reasons Jan Konopca kept his landline number and switched over to cell phone service.

For instance: The wires that ran to his residential line were being gnawed on by squirrels. Also, the number on his landline was easy to remember; he kept it so that his elderly mother would have an easy time recalling it. And he wanted the women he met at bars to be able to remember his number after knocking back a few drinks.

The New Jersey resident offered these rationales in a TCPA suit brought against FDS Bank in 2015.The company called Konopca more than 600 times between 2011 and 2015, when Konopca decided to sue FDS in the District of New Jersey.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from