Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2017

What Could We Infer From Chief Justice Fitzgerald's Question Patterns In Criminal Cases?

This week, we turn our attention to Chief Justice Fitzgerald's patterns in criminal cases.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Last week, we continued our analysis of the Court's oral arguments between 2008 and 2016 with a look at former Chief Justice Fitzgerald's patterns in civil cases during the two years before he retired, 2008-2010.  This week, we turn our attention to Chief Justice Fitzgerald's patterns in criminal cases.

In all, Chief Justice Fitzgerald voted with the majority to affirm in 59 cases, and voted with the majority to reverse in 55 criminal cases.  He wrote the majority opinion affirming in eight criminal cases, and wrote the majority opinion reversing in six criminal cases.

In both affirmances and reversals, Chief Justice Fitzgerald followed the same pattern as most of the other Justices, questioning the losing party more heavily.  In affirmances, Chief Justice Fitzgerald averaged 5.46 questions to appellants, but only 2.41 to appellees.  Writing the majority opinion had a substantial effect; in cases where he was writing the majority, Chief Justice Fitzgerald averaged

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from