Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2017

What Can We Infer From Justice Thomas' Question Patterns In Criminal Cases?

Last week, we analyzed the pattern of Justice Thomas' questions in oral arguments in civil cases.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Last week, we analyzed the pattern of Justice Thomas' questions in oral arguments in civil cases.  This week, we address Justice Thomas' patterns in criminal cases.

When Justice Thomas is in the majority, he questions the losing side more heavily than the party which will lose the case.  Justice Thomas has written the majority opinion in thirty of 154 affirmances.  He averages 5.87 questions to appellants and 1.69 questions to appellees in affirmances.  Justice Thomas has written the majority opinion in 87 of 508 criminal reversals.  He averages 3.06 questions to appellants and 4.53 questions to appellees.

Writing the majority opinion impacts Justice Thomas' patterns in criminal affirmances.  When writing the majority opinion, Justice Thomas averages 7.97 questions to appellants and 2.17 questions to appellees.  When not writing an opinion, Justice Thomas averages 5.4 questions to appellants and 1.56 questions to appellees.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from