Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 APRIL 2023

What's The Harm? Second Circuit Requires Proof Of Irreparable Harm To Enjoin Restrictive Covenant Violations

Davis+Gilbert LLP
Davis+Gilbert LLP
Contributor
Davis+Gilbert LLP

Davis+Gilbert LLP

Legal mastery is critical but not enough. Even the best legal strategies must work in tandem with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Davis+Gilbert LLP

When companies seek a court injunction for a restrictive covenant violation, they often focus on the covenant's enforceability.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Bottom Line

  • Federal district courts in the Second circuit will not presume that a company will suffer irreparable harm for a restrictive covenant violation.
  • Parties should not rely on contractual stipulations alone to establish irreparable harm.
  • A party seeking a court injunction for the breach of a non-compete or non-solicitation covenant must present actual evidence that it will suffer imminent, irreparable harm.

When companies seek a court injunction for a restrictive covenant violation, they often focus on the covenant's enforceability. They do this by arguing that the non-compete and customer non-solicitation covenants protect legitimate business interests - and is narrowly tailored to protect those interests.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from