Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JANUARY 2022

This Week At The Ninth: Wait Until Next Time

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This week, the Court addressed two questions of appellate jurisdiction, holding there is no right to immediate appellate review of a district court's denial of...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week, the Court addressed two questions of appellate jurisdiction, holding there is no right to immediate appellate review of a district court's denial of derivative sovereign immunity or of a fact-bound district court order certified for review under section 1292(b).

CHILDS v. SAN DIEGO FAMILY HOUSING LLC

The Court holds that a denial of derivative sovereign immunity is not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine.

Panel: Judges Ikuta, Bennett, and Nelson, with Judge Ikuta writing the opinion.

Key Highlight: "Our conclusion in Alaska that the interest served by federal sovereign immunity (i.e., giving the government a defense to payment of damages) 'may be served equally well if review follows a final judgment on the merits,' is applicable to parties claiming derivative sovereign immunity. . . . And our reasoning in Rodriguez that the interest served by the government contractor immunity (i.e., giving contractors a shield from

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from