Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2023

This Week At The Ninth: The First Amendment And Disability Rights In The OC

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

"Three structural features of the [municipal advisory board], taken together, legally make its members public surrogates of the appointing councilperson.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week, the Court addresses whether the dismissal of a volunteer member of a municipal advisory board implicates the First Amendment and considers a challenge to zoning ordinances designed to limit sober living homes.

The Court holds that the First Amendment does not protect a volunteer member of a municipal advisory board from dismissal by the city councilperson who appointed her.

The panel: Judges Watford, Hurwitz, and Vitaliano (E.D.N.Y.), with Judge Hurwitz writing the opinion.

Key highlight: "Three structural features of the [municipal advisory board], taken together, legally make its members public surrogates of the appointing councilperson. First, each councilperson appoints one member to the board. Second, that councilperson can remove her appointee at her discretion. Third, the [municipal advisory board]'s purpose is to advise about public policy—its legal duty is to interface with the City Council's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from