Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2023

This Week At The Ninth: Sham Phone Operations And E-Cigarettes

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This week, the Court addresses the FCC's adjudicatory authority and considers the scope of specific personal jurisdiction in product-liability suits.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week, the Court addresses the FCC's adjudicatory authority and considers the scope of specific personal jurisdiction in product-liability suits.

WIDE VOICE, LLC v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

The Court holds that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") did not exceed its authority in finding that a telephone company acted unlawfully by restructuring its business operations to continue imposing charges that were otherwise prohibited by the agency's rules.

The panel: Judges Paez, Bade, and Collins (D. Ariz.), with Judge Paez writing the opinion.

Key highlight: "It is well established that the FCC has broad discretion to administer the Communications Act through rulemaking and adjudication. While the FCC, unlike a court, can make new law protectively through the exercise of its rule-making powers, adjudication is just as necessary as not every principle can or should be cast immediately into the mold of a general rule. Adjudication empowers

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from