Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 DECEMBER 2022

This Week At The Ninth: Arbitration And Social Media

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This week, the Court addresses whether the Federal Arbitration Act's grounds for vacatur are available to challenge an arbitration award governed by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week, the Court addresses whether the Federal Arbitration Act's grounds for vacatur are available to challenge an arbitration award governed by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and holds that mass social media communications can qualify as solicitations under the Securities Act of 1933.

HAYDAY FARMS, INC. V. FEEDX HOLDINGS, INC.

The Court holds that the Federal Arbitration Act's (FAA) grounds for vacatur are available to challenge an arbitration award governed by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, but that the FAA's high standard for vacatur was not met in this case.

The panel: Judges M. Smith, Nelson, and Drain, sitting by designation from the Eastern District of Michigan, with Judge Nelson writing the opinion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from