Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 SEPTEMBER 2018

The Implications Of The Second Circuit's Ruling In Hoskins

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed the Department of Justice a rare defeat on 24 August

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed the Department of Justice a rare defeat on 24 August by holding that prosecutors could not assert conspiracy or aiding and abetting liability to effectively circumvent the jurisdictional language of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

In United States v Hoskins, the Second Circuit grappled with whether a foreign national who could not be charged as a principal for violating the FCPA could be guilty as a co-conspirator or an accomplice – a strategy the DOJ has pursued in past cases and asserted in its published guidance. In reviewing the language of the FCPA as well as its legislative history, the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the district court and found that the DOJ's overly broad jurisdictional argument was beyond what the US Congress intended for the statute.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from