Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 AUGUST 2007

Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., No. 06-484

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

In an effort to curb abusive securities fraud litigation, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA") requires plaintiffs to "state with particularity facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted" with scienter, i.e., that the defendant’s intention was to deceive, manipulate, or defraud. 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(2) (emphasis added).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 21, 2007

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/06-484.pdf.

In an effort to curb abusive securities fraud litigation, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA") requires plaintiffs to "state with particularity facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted" with scienter, i.e., that the defendant’s intention was to deceive, manipulate, or defraud. 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(2) (emphasis added). Today, the Supreme Court held that, in order to qualify as "strong," "an inference of scienter must be more than merely plausible or reasonable—it must be cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference of nonfraudulent intent."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from