Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2019

Supreme Court Settles Age-Old Arbitrability Debate

Many construction contracts designate arbitration as the means to adjudicate disputes which are not resolved through executive negotiation, mediation or some alternate method. Occasionally,

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Many construction contracts designate arbitration as the means to adjudicate disputes which are not resolved through executive negotiation, mediation or some alternate method. Occasionally, a question arises whether the claim falls within the scope of the arbitration clause. In other words, the parties debate whether the dispute is arbitrable under the contract. Examples of such arbitrability disagreements include claims for negligence, misrepresentation, fraud, interference in business relationships or other non-contractual claims. One of the parties might file a lawsuit and request the court to decide the issue of arbitrability of the claim. For many years, legal scholars have debated whether the court or the arbitrator should decide the threshold arbitrability question.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from