Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2013

Supreme Court Ducks Mootness Question In Genesis

A discussion on whether an unaccepted offer of judgment for full relief made prior to a motion to certify does moot the plaintiff’s claim in an FLSA collective action.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Does an unaccepted offer of judgment for full relief made prior to a motion to certify moot the plaintiff's claim in an FLSA collective action?  That was the question we hoped the Supreme Court would answer in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk.  Unfortunately, the majority in the 5-4 opinion issued April 16 refused to decide that question, finding that the issue was not properly before the Court because the plaintiff had conceded her claim was moot in the district court and Third Circuit, and had not contested the issue in her opposition to the petition for certiorari.  While we now know from the dissent that Justices Kagan, Breyer, Sotomayor and Ginsburg would find that an unaccepted offer of judgment has no impact on the validity of the underlying claim, the majority opinion leaves unresolved a split among the Circuits.  The Seventh Circuit accepts the argument that a claim must be dismissed as moot when an offer of judgment for full relief is made prior to a motion

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from