Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2008

Supreme Court Docket Report – Decision Alert – June 25, 2008

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

In an important decision that could put the brakes on the run-away punitive awards that have plagued the business community for the last two decades, the Supreme Court held today that the maximum permissible ratio of punitive to compensatory damages under maritime law is ordinarily 1:1.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 25, 2008

Keywords: Exxon Shipping Co., punitive awards, Baker, Exxon Valdez, Justice Stevens, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, maritime law, Clean Water Act, American Petroleum Institute, American Chemistry Council

October Term 2007

Today the Supreme Court issued a decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker No. 07-219 (previously discussed in the October 29, 2007 Docket Report).

In an important decision that could put the brakes on the run-away punitive awards that have plagued the business community for the last two decades, the Supreme Court held today that the maximum permissible ratio of punitive to compensatory damages under maritime law is ordinarily 1:1. Although nominally limited to punitive damages under federal maritime law, the effect of today's decision is likely to reach far beyond maritime

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from