Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 FEBRUARY 2009

Supreme Court Docket Report - February 25, 2009

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Today the Supreme Court issued a decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published February 25, 2009

Keywords: Pacific Bell, linkLine Communications, AT&T, DSL service, California, price squeeze, federal communications law, Sherman Act, federal communications law,

Today the Supreme Court issued a decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc., No. 07-512 (previously discussed in the June 23, 2008 Docket Report).

AT&T owns much of the infrastructure and facilities needed to provide DSL service in California. As a condition for a recent merger, the Federal Communications Commission requires AT&T to provide wholesale DSL transport service to rival internet service providers (ISPs) at a price no greater than the retail price of AT&T's DSL service. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc., No. 07-512, to decide whether a "price squeeze" claim may be brought under § 2 of the Sherman Act

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from