Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JANUARY 2017

Supreme Court Declines To Resolve False Claims Act Public Disclosure Bar Circuit Split

Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Contributor
Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray is one of the world’s most respected law firms, with offices in key business and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ropes & Gray LLP

The court's analysis focused on the content of two disclosures, the FTA letter and the Rubin Audit Report.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On October 3, 2016, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Cause of Action v. Chicago Transit Authority, allowing the circuit split regarding what it means for information to be in the "public domain" under the False Claims Act ("FCA") to persist.  137 S. Ct. 205 (2016).  On appeal, the Seventh Circuit had affirmed the district court's dismissal of relator's claims because the defendant's alleged misconduct fell with the FCA's public disclosure bar.  In its decision, the panel admitted that "some of our sister circuits have criticized our reading of [public domain]."  Cause of Action v. Chicago Transit Authority, 815 F.3d 267, 275 (7th Cir. 2016).  Nevertheless, the panel declined to engage in an "in-depth reconsideration of our precedent."  Id. at 277.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from