Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 OCTOBER 2026

Second Circuit Holds EFAA Invalidates Arbitration Agreements For All Claims In Cases Involving Sexual Harassment

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addresses a critical question about the scope of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021: does the statute invalidate arbitration agreements for individual claims or entire lawsuits? This decision resolves whether employees alleging sexual harassment can bring all their claims to court, including those unrelated to harassment, when a pre-dispute arbitration agreement exists.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Decision Alert: Diaz-Roa v. Hermes Law, P.C., No. 24-3223-CV, 2026 WL 2931801 (2d Cir. Sept. 30, 2026)

Introduction

On September 30, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Diaz-Roa v. Hermes Law, P.C., No. 24-3223-CV, 2026 WL 2931801 (2d Cir. Sept. 30, 2026), addressing for the first time the interpretation of the term “case” under the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (“EFAA”). The Second Circuit held that “when it is applicable, the EFAA enables a plaintiff to invalidate a pre-dispute arbitration agreement as to the entire lawsuit, rather than only the sexual harassment or sexual assault claims contained within that lawsuit.”

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

See more popular content from