Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 2025

Pitts v. Mississippi (No 24-1149)

Wiggin and Dana LLP
Wiggin and Dana LLP
Contributor
Wiggin and Dana LLP

Wiggin and Dana LLP

Wiggin and Dana is a full-service law firm of highly talented, creative and experienced lawyers...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wiggin and Dana LLP

In Pitts v. Mississippi (No 24-1149), the Nine summarily reversed a Mississippi Supreme Court decision that effectively ignored the Court's decisions in Coy v. Iowa (1988) and Maryland v. Craig (1990)...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Pitts v. Mississippi (No 24-1149), the Nine summarily reversed a Mississippi Supreme Court decision that effectively ignored the Court's decisions in Coy v. Iowa (1988) and Maryland v. Craig (1990), which require trial courts to make case-specific findings of necessity before precluding a criminal defendant from exercising his Sixth Amendment right to confront child witnesses "face to face."

Jeffrey Pitts was convicted of sexually abusing his daughter, after a trial at which the child was permitted to testify against Pitts from behind a screen. Pitts objected to the screen as a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation, but the trial judge overruled the objection based on a Mississippi state law that gives child witnesses the "right" to testify behind a "screen that ... obscure[s] the child's view of the defendant." On appeal, the Mississippi Supreme Court acknowledged that the trial court had failed to make a case-specific finding that the screen

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from