Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 SEPTEMBER 2025

"Only To The Extent Permitted" - Having Your Cake And Eating It

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

Like most people, lawyers love the idea of having their cake and eating it. A good example is when they deploy the phrase "only to the extent permitted".

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Like most people, lawyers love the idea of having their cake and eating it. A good example is when they deploy the phrase "only to the extent permitted". But does it work as a drafting technique? A recent Court of Appeal case, looking at litigation funding agreements, suggests it does.

PACCAR – a recap

The 2023 UK Supreme Court decision in PACCAR established that litigation funding agreements of the type that were then widespread in collective proceedings in the Competition Appeal Tribunal — with a "funder's fee" calculated as a percentage of the damages awarded to the successful class representative — are damages-based agreements. As a result, they are only enforceable if compliant with the statutory regime for damages-based agreements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from