Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2011

New Hope For Tort Claims In Contract Litigation

Since the Washington Supreme Court’s decision in Alejandre v. Bull in 2007, a plaintiff was generally prohibited from recovering money damages in tort (e.g. a claim based on negligence) if (a) the plaintiff and defendant had a contract and (b) the tort arose out of the subject matter of that contract.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Since the Washington Supreme Court's decision in Alejandre v. Bull in 2007, a plaintiff was generally prohibited from recovering money damages in tort (e.g. a claim based on negligence) if (a) the plaintiff and defendant had a contract and (b) the tort arose out of the subject matter of that contract. Dubbed the "Economic Loss Rule," the logic was to encourage parties in a contractual relationship to allocate the risk of loss in the contract. For example, in Alejandre, the Supreme Court precluded homebuyers from pursuing a negligence claim against their seller when the septic tank turned out to be defective. Instead, the buyers were limited to whatever claims they had under their contract with the sellers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from