Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 NOVEMBER 2024

Mediation And The Limits Of Without Prejudice Privilege

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Contributor
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

UK 2026 Chambers Firm Profile Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) is an international, fully...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Mediation is a common way to resolve disputes and one of its advantages is that any discussions are undertaken on a without prejudice basis...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Mediation is a common way to resolve disputes and one of its advantages is that any discussions are undertaken on a without prejudice basis, so that parties can speak freely. Indeed, the without prejudice privilege that attaches to settlement discussions is an established principle of English law.

The recent decision in Pentagon v Cadman Ltd considered the extent to which this privilege applied in context of mediation. While the aim of this rule is to protect discussions from being disclosed, it is important to recognise that it is subject to a number of exceptions, as established in previous decisions including Unilever plc v The Proctor & Gamble Co and Oceanbulk Shipping v TMT.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from