Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2006

In Brief: Supreme Court Ruling on Sovereign Immunity

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Revisiting an issue that it left unresolved 10 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on January 23, 2006 in Central Virginia Community College v. Katz that the states agreed not to assert sovereign immunity from a bankruptcy trustee's suit to avoid a preferential transfer when they ratified the Constitution's bankruptcy clause.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Revisiting an issue that it left unresolved 10 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on January 23, 2006 in Central Virginia Community College v. Katz that the states agreed not to assert sovereign immunity from a bankruptcy trustee's suit to avoid a preferential transfer when they ratified the Constitution's bankruptcy clause. In its first bankruptcy ruling of 2006, the Court re-examined its 1996 decision on the scope of a state's 11th Amendment immunity in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida. Both the majority and the dissenters in Seminole assumed that a statement in that case — that Congress lacks authority under Article I to abrogate a state's immunity — would apply in the bankruptcy context.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from