Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2025

Fed. Cir. Invalidates Atorvastatin Hemicalcium Salt Claim

Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP
Explore more from Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP

The Federal Circuit, in Pfizer, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., 457 F.3d 1284 (Fed. Cir. August. 2, 2006), reversed the District Court holding that claim 6 directed...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Federal Circuit, in Pfizer, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., 457 F.3d 1284 (Fed. Cir. August. 2, 2006), reversed the District Court holding that claim 6 directed to the hemicalicum salt of atorvastatin was valid even though it recognized there was a “technical problem” with the drafting of claim 6, because parent claim 2 recited only atorvastatin acid and the hemicalicum salt of atorvastatin acid is not an acid falling within the scope of claim 2. The Federal Circuit acknowledged that there may be ways to redraft claim 6 to cover the subject matter in a way that does not violate 112 ¶4, however the court, citing Nazomi Commc'ns, Inc. v. Arm Holdings, PLC, determined that court should not rewrite claims to preserve their validity.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from