Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JANUARY 2020

False Claims Act - Year In Review: Five Decisions That Will Affect The Future Of FCA Litigation

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recorded another banner year of over $3 billion in False Claims Act (FCA) recoveries in 2019.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Points:

  • False Claims Act plaintiff cannot use discovery to satisfy Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b).
  • Payment of fair market value is a dispositive defense in FCA actions alleging a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute.
  • Qui tam plaintiffs cannot proceed with separate claims or against separate defendants once the government intervenes unless the government intervenes in the relator's additional claims.
  • CMS's most recent Stark law interpretation significantly diverges from recent Stark law/FCA court decisions.
  • Subregulatory guidance that is not tethered to a statute or regulation cannot serve as the foundation to an FCA action.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recorded another banner year of over $3 billion in False Claims Act (FCA) recoveries in 2019.1 The health care industry, as usual, bore the brunt of the recoveries with DOJ registering over $2.6 billion in recoveries.2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from