Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MAY 2015

Different Standards For Self-Critical Analysis Privilege: What You Need To Know

In a recent March 19, 2015 decision, the Illinois Supreme Court refused to acknowledge the self-critical analysis privilege.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent March 19, 2015 decision, the Illinois Supreme Court refused to acknowledge the self-critical analysis privilege. This recent discussion underscores the need to understand the different standards for the privilege in each jurisdiction a company operates under and the importance of the proactive steps to safeguard privilege detailed in our November 13, 2014 post, Protecting Your Safety Investigations and Deliberations from Prying Eyes. Illinois now joins a number of states, such as Indiana and Rhode Island, that have refused to adopt the privilege absent legislative authority.

In Harris v. One Hope United, Inc., 2015 IL 117200, the Illinois Supreme Court was asked to determine whether the self-critical analysis privilege applied to "Priority Review" reports or quality control reports created by an agency within the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS), One Hope. In this case – based on the death of an infant whose family was

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from