Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2014

Court Says "Porch-Like Structures" Do Not Violate ADA

The Tenth Circuit overturned a decision requiring that every "porch-like" entrance to Hollister retail establishments be accessible to persons with disabilities.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Lynn E. Calkins and Rafe Petersen are both partners and Christine N. Walz is an Associate all in our Washington, D.C. office.

In an important decision for retailers and other public accommodations, the Tenth Circuit overturned a lower court decision requiring that every "porch-like" entrance to Hollister retail establishments be remediated to be accessible to persons with disabilities. 

Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, retail establishments are "public accommodations" prohibited from discriminating against the disabled in the full and equal enjoyment of public accommodations. In Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Plaintiffs argued that the Defendants' Hollister stores violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act because the stores had inaccessible "porch-like structures" that served as the stores' center entrance. The porch had multiple uses: functioning "as a customer lounge and as a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from