Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 FEBRUARY 2021

Circuit Limits Reach Of Recent Career Offender Decision

In McCloud v. United States, the Second Circuit (Walker, Raggi, Nardini) rejected the petitioner's contention that a development in Circuit

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In McCloud v. United States, the Second Circuit (Walker, Raggi, Nardini) rejected the petitioner's contention that a development in Circuit law following a defendant's conviction constitutes a newly-discovered fact extending the deadline for a defendant to file a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.  In so holding, the Second Circuit reached the same conclusion as the three other circuits to have addressed the question.  It effectively limits the reach of a recent favorable decision to pending and future cases.

McCloud was sentenced in 2009 to 202 months' imprisonment for various narcotics and firearms offenses.  That sentence was driven in part by McCloud's two prior state convictions; at the time, it was undisputed that those convictions were "controlled substance offenses" that rendered McCloud a "Career Offender" subject to a sentencing enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines.  Nearly ten years later, in United States v. Townsend, 897 F.3d 66 (2d Cir.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from