Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2024

Audit Watchdog's Future At Risk After Supreme Court's SEC Ruling

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

The viability of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's enforcement proceedings is in question following the US Supreme Court's decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, because the PCAOB has no statutory.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
  • Kramer Levin attorneys examine SEC v. Jarkesy impact on PCAOB
  • In-house tribunal restrictions may apply to board proceedings

The viability of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's enforcement proceedings is in question following the US Supreme Court's decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, because the PCAOB has no statutory authority to bring such proceedings in federal court.

The court held that the Seventh Amendment entitles a defendant to a jury trial when the SEC seeks civil penalties for securities fraud. That means the SEC can't compel the defendant to adjudicate such claims in the agency's in-house tribunals.

Like the SEC, the PCAOB conducts investigations and can bring disciplinary proceedings against registered public accounting firms and associated persons. The PCAOB's purview is limited to alleged violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, PCAOB rules, professional standards, and securities laws "relating to the preparation and issuance of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from