Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2007

Arbitration Deadlines Have Teeth

Insurers often think of arbitration proceedings as less formal than courtroom litigation. In its recent decision in "Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Argonaut Ins. Co.", the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has made clear that, a party who presumes that arbitration proceedings will allow it freedom from strict enforcement of contractual terms may be in for a rude awakening.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Insurers often think of arbitration proceedings as less formal than courtroom litigation. In its recent decision in Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Argonaut Ins. Co.,1 the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has made clear that, at least with respect to contractual arbitrator appointment deadlines, a party who presumes that arbitration proceedings will allow it freedom from strict enforcement of contractual terms may be in for a rude awakening.

The Argonaut case involved a reinsurance dispute over an asbestos claim. Argonaut had settled with one of its insureds and sought reimbursement from a Lloyd's syndicate under several reinsurance treaties. When the syndicate asked for more information rather than offering payment, Argonaut responded with an arbitration demand.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from