Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2014

Applying The Attorney-Client Privilege To Outside Media Consultancy Communications

While attorney-client privilege is a well-established concept, application of the policy becomes murky when the communications in question are between a client and an outside PR firm.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

While attorney-client privilege is a well-established concept in the U.S. legal system, application of the policy becomes murky when the communications in question are between a client and an outside public relations firm hired to advise on issues related to forthcoming high-profile litigation. What makes this issue particularly tricky is that legal precedent is limited.

Reed Smith attorneys Colleen Davies, Andrew Stillufsen, and I (Lisa Baird) authored an article on the subject, "PR That's Protected," which appears in the October edition of Corporate Counsel. The article provides several recommendations for in-house counsel to minimize the chances of having communications with an outside media consultancy become part of the discovery or subpoena processes. Among these recommendations are a strict adherence to good document practices, the creation of a carefully-worded confidentiality agreement to be signed by the media consultancy and its members, and a clear

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from