Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 NOVEMBER 2018

Appeals Court Rejects Retaliation Claim Based On Religious Accommodation Request

In a case of first impression, a federal appeals court just found that an applicant's request for a religious accommodation did not constitute protected activity under Title VII for the purpose of establishing a retaliation claim.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a case of first impression, a federal appeals court just found that an applicant's request for a religious accommodation did not constitute protected activity under Title VII for the purpose of establishing a retaliation claim. Under the 8th Circuit's November 13 ruling, the appropriate avenue to challenge an employer's denial of a religious accommodation request under Title VII is by filing a disparate treatment claim, not through a retaliation cause of action. What can employers take from the  EEOC v. North Memorial Health Care  decision?

Rejected Religious Accommodation Request Leads To Litigation

Plaintiff Emily Sure-Ondara, a Seventh Day Adventist and RN, applied for a position in the "Advanced Beginner" residency program at North Memorial Health Care, a hospital in Minnesota. During the interview process, Sure-Ondara learned that the position would require her to work eight-hour shifts every other weekend, a schedule established by the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from