Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JULY 2001

Annual Review Of Case Law

Secrest Wardle Lynch Hampton Truex & Morley
Explore more from Secrest Wardle Lynch Hampton Truex & Morley

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Bruce Truex
Bruce Truex

This edition contains our annual review of significant cases from the Michigan courts. A number of Michigan trial courts invalidated the caps on damage awards set forth in the tort reform legislation of 1996. The Michigan Supreme Court also made significant rulings concerning exceptions to the governmental immunity statute and concerning the constructive notice requirement in premises liability actions.


Case Law Interpreting Tort Reform Caps On Damages

In 1996, the Michigan legislature passed several tort reform measures which set caps on non-economic loss (damages or loss due to pain and suffering or physical impairment or disfigurement) in medical malpractice and product liability actions. See M.C.L. ¤ 600.1483 and ¤ 600.2946a. Essentially, these provisions capped damages for non-economic loss at $280,000 (or $500,000 for death due to a product defect or for permanent loss of a vital bodily function due to a product defect or medical malpractice).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from